Presuppositional Apologetics

-

When I debate atheist’s, I don’t put God on trial by presenting evidences for a jury to decide (in this case, the atheist). I use an argument that accounts for the preconditions of knowledge and of moral absolutes. You might say, “Well then, where’s the argument?” I show the atheist’s how they constantly use our worldview (God’s immaterial realities) in arguing against us. Showing them that they are arguing like a person arguing against air, while breathing air the whole time.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Silly but Serious

-
Image
It has been ingrained into so many Christian heads that Bible prophecy is only to be understood in a Left Behind way. That to consider any other options is totally ludicrous. So, I’m tempted to give them a choice: They can either choose the blue pill or the red pill. If they’ll choose the blue pill, this conversation never took place. But if they’ll choose the red pill, they will see pass their beliefs to how things really are. Lol.
Read more

God’s Eternal Time

-
Image
It has been said that God is timeless. And I’ll say, “So what’s that?” And They’ll say, “That God exists outside our time, space, matter universe.” And I’ll ask again, “So what’s that?” And they’ll say, “I don’t know.” Lol. And I’ll say, “The reason you don’t know, is because you don’t know what ‘time’ is?” Time is the measurement of movement. Your view puts God in a frozen pose. God’s time is unending, not timeless.
Read more

A Divine Work

-
Image
How was the atonement of Christ applied to believers? It is because of substitution that justification occurs by faith. Since saving faith and justification are blood bought accomplishments of the cross to take care of unbelief and unrighteousness (by imputation, not infusion); the “application” of this substitutionary work occurs at conversion. In eternity it was planned, at Calvary it was accomplished, and at conversion it was applied.
Read more